Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: multi-homing fixes

  • From: Tony Hain
  • Date: Fri Aug 31 17:41:11 2001

Sean M. Doran wrote:

> Let me take some of your text out of context and agree with it fully:
> 
> [A permanently stable holes-in-CIDR-blocks environment exists]
> | Only if there is a limit on the number of ISPs. I don't think there 
> | is such a [practical rather than absolute] limit
> 
> The problem with metro-based addressing is that the statement
> above is equally true for it as for PA addressing.
> 

Understanding the truth in that general statement, 
I would like to know if anyone sees a significant
difference in the number of holes created by each 
approach. Handwaving can go either way, so the 
question is given real topologies and multi-homing
goals, is there enough difference in the number
of holes created to bias the approach? 

Responses should go to multi6@ops.ietf.org

Tony





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.